🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". The policy may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to pass a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," said a leading MEP behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level amid federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various individuals to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, other states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that states globally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.